- Tags:
- Show more
- Pages:
- 1
- Words:
- 275
Montejo v Louisiana Student’s Name Institution’s Name Montejo v Louisiana Capsule Montejo wrote an incriminating letter to the wife of the person he had was accused of killing. In Montejo, the court had to determine the allowed overlap between the Sixth and Fifth Amendments. It got held that defendants who miscarry in law and on a personal level to call on their right to counsel could waive their right to a lawyer willingly. The Fifth Amendment attaches when cited by the defendant (Montejo v. Louisiana, 2018a). Facts Montejo was accused and found culpable of first-degree murder by the state of Louisiana. As a norm during the preliminary hearing, Montejo got assigned counsel, but he did not acknowledge the appointment; it is the law for the courts in Louisiana to appoint counsels for the accused. Montejo proceeded to write an incriminating letter to the wife of the deceased. The prosecution tendered the letter as evidence in court. The defendant was convicted based on the message of apology written to the dead's wife (Montejo v. Louisiana, 2018). Issue The court upon reviewing of the presented evidence and the circumstances of the case, the settled on determining if a criminal defendant who has not personally or formally invoked the right to counsel can get questioned by the prosecution after waiver of Miranda rights, as long as the reservation is consistent with the Sixth Amendment. Holding The court affirmed that a defendant who had not formally or personally invoked their right to counsel could voluntarily waive their right to counsel even when there exists a
Leave feedback