Constitution Essay Examples

constitution through a referendum (Acton 1; Jones 1). In particular, the Turkish president has expressed the need for parliament to approve the new controversial draft constitution, while some section of the country is still not for it (Acton 1; Focus-Economics 1). As a result, it has become difficult for the nation to arrive at a positive decision. This uncertainty has hurt the Turkish Lira, making it almost impossible to trade equally with other currencies, such as the US dollar, Australian dollar, and the Euro, among others. Furthermore, political events have a great effect on Turkey's currency in the global market as they shape economic policies. Political events that affect Turkey’s exchange...

Case brief

0
(0)

constitution of Florida, is the 6th amendment warranty of the lawyer a significant right which should be made compulsory on the state by the constitution on the 14th amendment? Court decision: A unanimous court in the Gideon versus Wainwright overruled Betts versus Brady and believed that in its opponent method of the criminal justice where a person haled into a court and is extremely poor cannot be assured a fair judgment unless the lawyer is given for him. Holding: Denying the Betts reasoning, the Supreme Court decided that the right to assistance of the lawyers is essential and the fourteenth amendment of the constitution makes the right required in the courts of the state. Discussion: The...

Constitution helps people survive from the harsh realities and protect the freedom of speech. This First Amendment to the United States Constitution remains constitutional and the right of speech applies to state and local governments. However, some categories of speech are not protected by this Amendment. Since the government officials will censor organizations and people if they commit some acts of lasciviousness or indecency, sexually offensive behavior that is against social norms and obscenity, the act of using vulgar words relating to sex (Ess, 2014, p. 13). In other words, the digital media sites should be responsible to limit and censor the obscene scenes since they cause moral problems...

constitution, there is a fundamental component known as the bill of rights that was intended to safeguard the elementary civil liberties of the nation’s citizens. Formerly, it comprised ten amendments. Well along, a further seventeen adjustments were included in the constitution. Specific sections of these extra changes and the rights’ bill have had a fundamental effect on the system of criminal justice. These adjustments include the fourteenth, eighth, sixth, fifth, and fourth amendments. Their drive is destined to guarantee that persons are treated well if arrested or suspected of crimes. The fourth amendment defends people from unreasonable seizures and searches devoid of a warrant....

  • Words: 275
  • Pages: 1
Read more

constitution. Section 4 of the act provided a formula of identifying the states and counties which were affected while section five provided preclearance of these affected areas. Establishment of this act was of great importance since in a democratic country all the citizens in that particular country are entitled to rights to vote in order to choose leaders of their own preference. The decision of Supreme Court made on 25th, June 2013 that held that section 4 and 5 of the act as unconstitutional surely caused adverse effects to the affected states and will linger causing these advance effects. The court through John Roberts who is the Chief Justice contended that the struck down of the sections IV...

  • Words: 550
  • Pages: 2
Read more

constitution, which made him powerless. Louis had burned numerous, compromising documents which proved his attempt to flee when trying to cover his tracks (Caiani 12). Following his condemnation to death by a narrow majority, Louis assembled one of the best defense teams, comprising some of the best lawyers in France, the likes of Malesherbes and François Tronchet. The lawyers prepared the defense with skillfulness and conveyed it with energy, despite the risks they posed to their lives as well as careers. De Sèze had limited time to prepare but delivered a profound opening that emphasized on Louis's inviolability, and that the convention was not fit to judge him. The prosecution accused the king...

  • Words: 550
  • Pages: 2
Read more

constitution clearly stipulates the separation of powers between all the arms of government. The arms include the executive, legislature, and judiciary. The courts act as an arbiter of justice in the judiciary. The reconstruction debate aimed at ensuring that there is cohesion between the executive and the legislature. Also, States would be allowed to form their own governments through devolved units. It is an excellent idea that would ensure there was a separation of powers between the central government headed by the presidency and federal government headed by the governors. The judiciary played a pivotal role and continues to do so regarding administering oaths to the different governments. The...

constitution, and the dying process: the case of Theresa Marie Schiavo. Jama, 293(19), 2403-2407. Hook, C. C., & Mueller, P. S. (2005, November). The Terri Schiavo saga: the making of a tragedy and lessons learned. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Vol. 80, No. 11, pp. 1449-1460). Elsevier.Perry, J. E., Churchill, L. R., & Kirshner, H. S. (2005). The Terri Schiavo case: legal, ethical, and medical perspectives. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143(10),...

constitution. (Trinko 1) As a mainly Christian country, Christian ethics were used as the guide to determine rules governing Americans. However, Trinko feels that Islam is radically different from Christianity and therefore doubts the capability of Muslims to adhere to the same principles set in the constitution. To demonstrate these facts, Trinko points out to the fact that Islam is not just a religion but permeates strongly into adherents’ way of life. As such, most Muslims hold the Islamic teachings with higher regard to secular laws. This forms the basis for the insistence in sharia law in Muslim majority countries. In fact, Trinko points out that in democracies with higher Muslim population...

Constitution (Leatherman 1). The court of appeals had changed the pleading standard as laid out in section 1983; hence the pleadings by the plaintiffs did not meet the “heightened pleading standard” as required by the fifth circuit of appeal judges (Leatherman 1). The subordinate court found for the respondents, on appeal, the fifth circuit of appeals upheld the district court’s decision hence this suit (Leatherman 1). Issue The issue that was found worth deliberating on by the supreme court of the United States of America was, whether it was proper for the federal court to apply a “heightened pleading standard” in the case that was instituted by the plaintiffs (Leatherman 1). The...