Deontological Ethics and Teleological Ethics (Consequentialist)
When we talk about ethics, everyone thinks that it is a philosophy that studies the principles of human behavior, but partly they are wrong because ethics study the principles that are called moral, ethical philosophy, practical philosophy, practical reason. Now, ethics is broader than only the study of human behavior, it has different theories and approaches of different fields which have a different composition of moral. How do we distinguish those differences? What is your main difference? Well now we will see it.
When we refer to deontological ethics we talk we know that this is an ethical approach that focuses on the right and the wrong thing about behavior itself, instead of studying its consequences or any other consideration. Therefore, this is a theory without consequences, because determining if a behavior is good or bad does not depend on its consequences. The action here promotes moral decisions.
However, theological (consequentialist) ethics is more as a theory, according to which behavior correction depends on its results. In fact, the term ‘teleology’ comes from the Greek telos (which means purpose or objective) and logo, which means science. Therefore, teleology focuses on the consequences of actions.
In other words, this is theoretically speaking, our morally correct or incorrect behavior depends on the resulting quality. Therefore, the purpose is to try to understand the purpose of the object checking the results of the object. If you produce a good result, you will consider a good play, if you produce a bad result, you will consider another bad play.
In addition, this is a consistent theory, because moral rights or moral errors depend on the result of actions. Therefore, in teleological ethics, the consequences drive moral decisions. For example, most people think that lying is wrong, but if lying does not harm and helps a person to be happy or save her, then, from the point of view of teleological ethics, this action is correct. However, it is not always easy to determine the possible results or consequences of our actions. Therefore, this is the weakness of teleology
Teleology and deontology are two of the three main methods of ethics study. Moral ethics is a rules -based system, driven by the moral state to observe the rules. Teleology is usually called the theory of consequences and its morality is based on the final result of the action. Although there are many differences between these two moral methods, the most important thing is that deontology studies action and norms, while teleology studies the consequences.
The three branches of moral philosophy work together to help people deal with the difficult decisions they face every day. Taking a step back in this situation, the act of analyzing with this type of moral philosophy can lead someone to make a moral decision. Questioning the existing rules and thinking about moral options can help everyone to maintain quiet consciousness and make the world more decent.
This is where we conclude that teleology is an ethical method that focuses on the right and wrong of behavior when studying behavior, while deontology is an ethical method that focuses on whether the behavior itself is correct,Not in any behavior. Correct and incorrect. Other considerations. Therefore, this is the main difference between teleology and deontological ethics. Therefore, teleological ethics is a consistent theory and deontological ethics is a non -consistent theory. However, it is not always possible to predict the consequences of actions. This is the weakness of the teleological approach. In addition, the moral method has the disadvantage of being too rigid.
Leave feedback